Altadena Rebuild: Emerging Challenges
Altadena’s reconstruction after the 2025 wildfires is perhaps the largest ‘rebuild’ effort in Southern California’s history. Not surprisingly, emerging and unexpected concerns are arising daily, confusing many of the entities and people working in that community, slowing progress, and sometimes stopping efforts altogether.
Fortunately, there are ongoing conversations among public and private entities about what they’re experiencing and seeing, so there are opportunities to collaborate around solutions and ways forward. One such opportunity for discussion was the first of three Future of Work webinars hosted by the Economic and Workforce Division at Pasadena City College (PCC EWD) on June 4th, 2026. Six panelists joined the discussion:
- Dr. Jose Gomez – PCC’s President/Superintendent
- Anish Saraiya – Director of Altadena Recovery in the Office of Supervisor Kathryn Barger
- Joshua Humphries – California Community Foundation
- Anders Corey – Altadena Recovery & Rebuild Corporation
- Bryon Wong – San Gabriel Valley Habitat for Humanity
- Freddy Sayegh – Altadena Recovers
These professionals share their views, expertise, and projections as their agencies continue to press forward with the rebuild project.
A Long Slow Rise from the Ashes
Perhaps the biggest challenge is the fact that nothing like this – the restoration of an entire urban community – has been done before. In this case, virtually all of Altadena’s public assets (sewers, water supply, power grid) were destroyed or rendered inoperable by the fires. Over 9,000 buildings were flattened, including their infrastructure and systems. Those that weren’t directly affected were affected by association. Neighboring buildings were either scarred by burns or had their systems destroyed, even if their structure remained standing. The city itself must now determine how to reconstruct its infrastructure; a full-blown redesign appears necessary, not just a replacement of what was. And homeowners, even those with permits, are struggling to find the contractors they need to get started.
Consequently, according to webinar panelists, the challenges the community is facing are often unexpected and perplexing. Webinar panelists were happy to share their concerns and realities, as well as how their organizations are proceeding into the confusion. Three major hurdles were presented:
Not Enough Money
Most people and businesses are facing an uncomfortable reality: not having the funding needed to complete the rebuild. All the panelists agreed that the full expense of rebuilding the entire city is in the billions, not millions of dollars.
At the 18-month mark after the flames were extinguished, assessments reveal significant gaps in funding across almost all recovery efforts.
- For lower-income families, the actual cost of replacing their losses is probably beyond their means even after insurance is applied.
- For families with insurance, often that resource is depleted well before the needs are covered. And rising costs are driven by many factors:Building supplies are low due to high demand, and supplemental or other options often aren’t available at all. Even when they’re available, their prices are higher than anticipated.
- A llimited access to capital means many families have relied on insurance funds to finance their living situation for the full 18 months since they lost their house. When that source is gone, so will their opportunity to rebuild their home.
- Area renters, those who had sweetheart deals with owners to live in ADU’s and other available spaces attached to private homes, may not have the opportunity to return at all. Their living accommodations are gone, and it may be too expensive to add that amenity to the homeowner’s eventual tab.
The panelists also described a completely novel challenge: many of Altadena’s homeowners were ‘grandfathered’ into that ownership – their houses had been in the family for generations. Replacing those dwellings to the standard of their former glory is virtually impossible, given the rise in home and lot prices in the area. No one knows what will happen if they can’t afford to replace their home. Estimated costs for completing a single-home rebuild are typically $500,000 to $600,000 higher than originally expected.
Compounding these challenges is the fact that the federal government has yet to respond to Altadena’s $8 billion request for assistance.
Garbled Communications
This problem stems from the sheer number of entities on the ground trying to address their particular concern of the day; Altadena was served by seven separate water companies, each of which is trying to recover its assets and restore its service base. One company may be attempting to connect new home construction to the grid, but by doing so, it impedes another company’s efforts to get its water services work done that day. These confusions are also multiplied when there are conflicts between residential and commercial builders, each of which has a different set of building standards to follow.
- Homeowners have been compelled to become property developers.
- Volunteers are asked to provide professional services.
- Small businesses are having difficult conversations with the owners of the buildings in which they were tenants. Each of those separate entities have their own needs for the rebuild, and those differences can cause conflict.
And because the devastation covers the footprint of an entire city, everyone must sometimes work within the same geographical area, which can cause transportation and parking issues in streets still under construction. According to County Representative Anish Saraiya, Altadena will need $2.5 billion to adequately replace the public systems it lost.
No Unified Collaboration Systems
While many organizations have stepped up to coordinate services and activities within their scope of enterprise, an overarching network of integrated messaging and communications systems that encompasses the entire rebuild effort has yet to surface. Without that, no group or service provider can accurately assess their priorities, nor are there comprehensive plans available to tie the efforts of all to a single, cohesive strategy. This current situation compounds the confusion found in the field.
One response to this concern was given resoundingly by PCC President/Superintendent Dr. Jose Gomez. He shared his concerns that there are no construction programs presently available in local high schools to feed into college programs in order to develop an adequate workforce. Conversations intending to remedy this situation are already underway.
Dr. Gomez was also quick to offer PCC as a hub for collaboration for all concerned. Its location, just three miles from Altadena, makes it a convenient place for holding meetings. Its partners throughout the region have expertise and capacity that will benefit many involved in the reconstruction. And the school itself is now viewing Altadena’s recovery as a project for its constituents:
- PCC’s new Construction Trades Lab is already training a new class of relevant workers;
- Its Small Business Development Center and Women’s Business Center are engaging with Altadena residents and responders to provide guidance and support.
- PCC is also exploring adding new programs related to sectors beyond construction: infrastructure, utilities, services, and the like, so that all the values Altadena lost can – and will – be returned, better, more effective, and more efficient than before.
The webinar demonstrated that the value of these conversations will be seen in the end result of the rebuild effort. The discussion underscored the panelists’ shared focus on achieving what Altadena residents want most: to return home. How that looks will become more evident as the recovery process rolls on.












